You'd absolutely want to keep your individual bracketed images either in a RAW file or at least in a 16-bit format such as TIFF. This means most of the nuances are lost before you combine what is left into a single HDR: instead of being able to choose from a theoretical maximum of 196,608 levels per pixel per color, the HDR merge program is left with 768 of them. This is because what you do is taking three RAW files that each have 65,536 different intensity levels per pixel per color (RAW), then squeezing all of that image information into a mere 256 intensity levels per pixel per color (JPEG). Since you do not seem to realize it: creating separate JPEGs from your RAWs and then merging those into one HDR shot is a sure-fire way of arriving at lousy results. Here are the bracketed RAW files and the JPEGs created from those RAW files and used for the HDR merge. How about the RAW file so we can compare. It's worth mentioning that Aurora HD did an excellent job at removing any ghosting compared with the other HDR packages I mentioned.įranky I don't see a massive difference in either that would motivate me to spend that much. I'm wondering if I can satisfy the need for wide dynamic range photos by just using Photolab to process the correctly exposed RAW file, and other than the haloing, it seems to do a good job. In Photolab I used control points to darken the sky by pulling down the exposure and applied a little contrast.įrom Aurora HDR 2018 trial using three bracketed shotsįrom DXO Photolab 1.2 using the correctly exposed RAW fileĬomparing the two, the sky in the Aurora output is a little more dramatic but looking closely at the Photolab image you can see serious haloing at the left edges of the building and the sky. Note that the 3 photos used for the Aurora HDR merge were JPEGs from the bracketed RAW files as produced by PhotoLab. You may also be interested in exploring related categories: our best software guides or our comprehensive overviews of the top photography apps.On a recent trip to Rome I decided to shoot some bracketed photos to try out a few HDR applications and after trying out Photomatix, Nik HDR Efex, EasyHDR, SNS-HDR and Aurora HDR, I decided to try just using DXO Photolab to achieve a high dynamic range effect to compare with the output of Aurora HDR. We consistently update our reviews to cover the latest releases and updates in photo editing software, ensuring our readers stay at the forefront of post-processing advancements. PhotoWorkout’s software review category offers reliable and comprehensive guidance for photographers and videographers of all levels. For users interested in mobile video editing, our analysis of LumaFusion vs Premiere Rush provides a comprehensive guide.įrom new photo organizing software like Excire Foto to sophisticated photo processors, our software reviews cover a broad spectrum of tools that cater to a diverse range of photographic needs. In addition to reviews, we offer head-to-head comparisons to help you choose between popular software options, like our detailed comparison of ON1 Photo RAW vs Luminar. Also, we have evaluated AI-driven software like Photolemur 3 and HDR editors such as Aurora HDR and HDR Projects 8, among others. If you’re considering online graphic editors, our detailed comparison of Canva vs Picsart will help you make an informed decision. Our Topaz Photo AI Review offers a thorough exploration of Topaz Photo AI, examining the software’s image enhancement capabilities. This section offers in-depth insights into the functionality, performance, pricing, and overall value of various tools for both beginners and professional photographers. The Software Review Category on provides comprehensive, hands-on reviews of a broad range of photo and video software applications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |